PROOFPUNK krzemienski/proofpunk ⑂ main 18 skills 6+6 commands 13 doctrine refs 20 themes
01 / WHAT IT IS

“Done” means proven
by end-user testing

Proofpunk is an execution-first delivery plugin for Claude Code, oh-my-pi (OMP), and OpenCode: 18 skills where the AI drives the real system as an end user — clicking, typing, submitting via MCP/automation tools — and any claim it did not actually execute is reported UNVERIFIED, never PASS. No mocks, no stubs, no test-mode bypasses.

~$ /plugin marketplace add krzemienski/proofpunk
~$ /plugin install proofpunk@proofpunk-marketplace
proofpunk v2.2.0 │ 18 skills · 6 commands · doctrine hook · 20 flat-black themes
18 skills 6 slash commands +6 opencode 13 doctrine references 7 architecture docs 20 cyberpunk themes 3 platforms
THE IRON RULE

If the real system doesn't work, fix the real system. Never mocks, stubs, test doubles, fake endpoints, or test-mode bypasses.

END-USER ACTOR MANDATE

Validation is never faked, skipped, or assumed. The AI personally executes the actions a real end user would — clicking, tapping, typing, submitting. Unexecuted validation is UNVERIFIED, never done.

FRESH EVIDENCE

Run-scoped, sequential, non-empty, never reused across runs — cited by full path with a description of what is SEEN. PASS criteria are defined before evidence.

02 / THE SKILL STACK

18 skills, five layers, one closed graph

Every referenced skill ships — the Related Skills graph is closed. Layers from the repository architecture: orchestration composes prompt & plan, execution, proof, and deep analysis; every verdict cites the shared doctrine in references/.

All 18 skills, in detail →

03 / COMMAND SURFACE

Six verbs for the whole pipeline

01/proofpunk:implement orchestrated front door — mine, forge, plan, execute, prove, report ORCHESTRATE
02/proofpunk:install install project memory (CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md) plus scoped rules SETUP
03/proofpunk:verify end-user test the current work, producing executed proof PROVE
04/proofpunk:forge-prompt author high-quality prompts on the canonical XML skeleton AUTHOR
05/proofpunk:rate-prompt score any prompt against the 7-dimension /100 rubric, remediate to file SCORE
06/proofpunk:truth-audit repo-wide intent-vs-code truth audit with evidence-backed findings AUDIT

Full command reference →

04 / THE PROOF

Shipped against itself: the mood-ring walkthrough

examples/mood-ring/ is a complete live walkthrough on the Flaskr tutorial app: the Mood Ring feature (per-post mood emoji + filter bar), built and audited end-to-end by the skills in series. The sealed evidence run holds 19 artifacts, validate OK, including 5 browser screenshots committed as PNGs — and 32/32 tests green (24 baseline + 8 new).

  • A forged <script>alert(1)</script> mood POST safely defaults to 😐 with a flash notice.
  • An invalid ?mood=🦄 filter returns 200 unfiltered — no 500, no leak.
  • Visual inspection caught (and the loop fixed) a blue-on-blue invisible “All” filter label — a real HIGH defect.
THEMES — 20 FLAT-BLACK VARIATIONS

One canonical palette source renders to OMP, OpenCode, and Hyper formats: neon-tokyo, acid-rain, vapor-grid, ion-storm, red-line, … pure #000000 canvas, two-neon accent systems, tuned status colors.

THREE PLATFORMS, ONE PLUGIN

Claude Code plugin with SessionStart doctrine hook; OMP plugin with doctrine-guard extension; OpenCode plugin + agent + commands; plain skills for any agent via the installer.

05 / ARCHITECTURE

The system, rendered

graph TD
    M["proofpunk-marketplace<br/>.claude-plugin/marketplace.json"]
    M --> P["plugins/proofpunk<br/>the plugin"]
    M --> T["tools/<br/>proofpunk-install.sh + INSTALL.md"]
    M --> E["examples/mood-ring<br/>the sealed live walkthrough"]
    P --> S["skills/ — 18 skills"]
    P --> R["references/ — 13 shared doctrine files"]
    P --> D["docs/ — consolidation + validation records"]
    R -.->|cited by| S

(diagram source — pre-renderer unavailable)

graph TB
    subgraph ORCH["Orchestration"]
        IMP["implement"]
    end
    subgraph PROMPT["Prompt and Plan"]
        PF["prompt-forge"]
        BS["brainstorm"]
        VP["validation-plan"]
        PH["plan-hardening"]
    end
    subgraph EXEC["Execution"]
        IM2["implement"]
        ST["stack-testing"]
        MVR["mobile-validation-runner"]
    end
    subgraph PROOF["Proof"]
        EG["end-user-testing"]
        VI["visual-inspection"]
        UX["ui-experience-audit"]
        FFA["full-functional-audit"]
    end
    subgraph DEEP["Deep analysis"]
        RCD["root-cause-debugging"]
        RTE["red-team-eval"]
        PR["production-readiness"]
        SI["session-intent"]
    end
    subgraph DOC["Doctrine — plugins/proofpunk/references/"]
        REF["end-user-actor.md<br/>evidence-contract.md<br/>severity-model.md<br/>platform-routing.md<br/>preflight-checks.md<br/>ci-gates.md<br/>defect-pattern-database.md<br/>web-wcag-checklist.md<br/>ios-hig-checklist.md"]
    end
    ORCH --> PROMPT
    ORCH --> EXEC
    ORCH --> PROOF
    ORCH --> DEEP
    PROMPT --> EXEC
    EXEC --> PROOF
    DEEP --> PROOF
    PROOF -.->|every verdict cites| DOC
    EXEC -.->|discipline from| DOC
    PROMPT -.->|stage 8 from| DOC

(diagram source — pre-renderer unavailable)

graph LR
    IMP["implement"] --> SI["session-intent"]
    IMP --> PF["prompt-forge"]
    IMP --> VP["validation-plan"]
    IMP --> PH["plan-hardening"]
    IMP --> IM2["implement"]
    IMP --> RCD["root-cause-debugging"]
    IMP --> EG["end-user-testing"]
    IMP --> ST["stack-testing"]
    IMP --> BS["brainstorm"]
    IM2 --> VP
    IM2 --> EG
    IM2 --> BS
    BS --> VP
    BS --> PH
    BS --> IM2
    VP --> PH
    VP --> EG
    VP --> IM2
    PH --> VP
    PH --> PF
    PF --> PH
    PF --> VP
    FFA --> EG
    FFA --> UX
    UX --> VI
    MVR["mobile-validation-runner"] --> VI
    MVR --> UX
    MVR --> EG
    RCD --> ST
    RCD --> EG
    ST --> EG
    ST --> RCD
    ST --> IM2
    PR["production-readiness"] --> FFA
    PR --> ST
    PR --> EG
    PR --> PH
    RTE["red-team-eval"] --> PH
    RTE --> PF
    RTE --> EG
    SI --> PR
    SI --> RCD
    SI --> EG
    EG --> VI
    EG --> UX

(diagram source — pre-renderer unavailable)

sequenceDiagram
    autonumber
    participant U as User
    participant I as implement
    participant SI as session-intent
    participant SC as scout agents
    participant PF as prompt-forge
    participant PL as validation-plan + plan-hardening
    participant RC as root-cause-debugging
    participant PR as proof layer (end-user driving + end-user-testing + stack-testing)
    U->>I: implement "add billing webhooks" --parallel --auto --mine
    I->>SI: Phase 1: mine past implementation sessions
    SI-->>I: intent matrix (prompts, tools, files, commits)
    I->>I: Phase 0: distill TRUE success criteria
    alt criteria not clearly laid out
        I->>U: present distilled criteria
        U-->>I: approval (the only mandatory stop)
    end
    par Phase 2: parallel exploration
        I->>SC: structure scout
        I->>SC: patterns scout
        I->>SC: contracts scout
        I->>SC: history scout (fed by mined matrix)
    end
    SC-->>I: 3-6 bullet context summary
    I->>PF: Phase 3: forge implementation prompt (canonical XML skeleton)
    PF-->>I: prompt with output_contract + validation per criterion
    I->>PF: Phase 4: --parallel -> PIPELINE mode, .prompts/ stages in parallel
    PF-->>I: dependency-aware stage tree
    I->>PL: harden the plan (proof obligations inside, not after)
    par Phase 5: parallel execution lanes
    end
    loop --auto: until every criterion is proven
        IM2 -->>I: lane result
        alt failure
            I->>RC: reproduce, minimize, root-cause fix
            RC-->>I: fix + blast-radius re-check
        end
        I->>PR: validate criterion as the end user
        PR-->>I: PASS / UNVERIFIED (= NOT DONE, keep going)
    end
    I->>U: criteria-by-criteria proof table + todo ledger + sealed evidence

(diagram source — pre-renderer unavailable)

stateDiagram-v2
    [*] --> InitRun: fresh_evidence.py init-run <slug>
    InitRun --> Capture: run-<timestamp>-<slug>/ created
    Capture --> Capture: next-step <slug> per artifact (step-NN)
    Capture --> Seal: fresh_evidence.py seal
    Seal --> Validate: evidence-inventory.txt written
    Validate --> Passed: exit 0 — fresh + non-empty + cited
    Validate --> Refused: exit 2 — STALE:/EMPTY: per artifact
    Refused --> Capture: re-capture the offending artifact
    Passed --> [*]: verdict may cite this run

(diagram source — pre-renderer unavailable)

the full call graph + method ownership →

OVERVIEWv2.2.0 · ⑂ main · 18 skills · 6+6 commands · 13 refs · generated 2026-09-04